🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," commented one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to copy this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of this nation and others show that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.